Software testing reviews are an essential part of the software development lifecycle. They are a systematic examination of a document by one or more people with the primary objective of finding and eliminating errors in the early stages of the software development process. Reviews, static analysis, and dynamic testing are the different test techniques used to find different types of defects effectively and efficiently. Static techniques find the causes of defects, while dynamic tests find the fault itself.
Revision is also a form of testing: the verification part of the V&V is also called a static test.When performing a review, there are certain guidelines that should be followed. The moderator is responsible for planning and coordinating the inspection and ensuring that the review process is followed and that other reviewers fulfill their responsibilities throughout the review process. From the definition of software testing, it is clear that software testing is a fundamental component of software quality assurance. Each time the customer reviews them, they always ask for this aspect similar to the one mentioned in the design specifications.Software testing is a process that consists of all lifecycle activities, both static and dynamic, related to the planning, preparation and evaluation of software products and related work products to determine that they meet specified requirements, demonstrating that they are fit for purpose and detect defects.
Typical defects that are easier to find in review than in dynamic testing are deviation from standards, requirements defects, design defects, insufficient serviceability, and incorrect interface specifications.Reviews can be performed on any of the software works, such as requirements specification, design specification, code, test plans, test specification, test cases, test scripts, user guides, or web pages. If done and maintained correctly, it can be a good resource to keep track of each and every step in the progress of the software release. The advantage of testing at all stages is that it helps to find different flaws at different stages of software development. Sometimes, software has fewer benefits and a greater number of disadvantages falling; in this condition software is discarded or better software development is proposed.If the project has only a few errors, the team asks that the errors be corrected and there are no more review meetings.
Benefits include improvements in development productivity and reduced development timelines; cost and time savings in testing; reduced lifetime costs; fewer defects; and better communication. You may also find omissions (e.g., how a review is conducted) depending on the agreed objectives of the review such as finding defects, gaining understanding, educating evaluators and new team members.